<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cheeky Monkey Business Solutions &#187; Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/tag/innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co</link>
	<description>A human approach to innovation and change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Sustainable PLM &amp; the $1 project?</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/05/sustainable-plm-the-1-project/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sustainable-plm-the-1-project</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/05/sustainable-plm-the-1-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nina Dar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Change Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformational Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Originality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product lifecycle management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think Different]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheeky-monkey.co/?p=2739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you that don&#8217;t know Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) is the art of managing your products from idea all the way through the development process to the point of changing it or killing it with &#8220;crystal ball&#8221; ability to getting the biggest bang for your buck. PLM may sound simple, the art is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="forward">For those of you that don&#8217;t know Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) is the art of managing your products from idea all the way through the development process to the point of changing it or killing it with &#8220;crystal ball&#8221; ability to getting the biggest bang for your buck.</P>

<a href="http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/05/sustainable-plm-the-1-project/dollar/" rel="attachment wp-att-2765"><img src="http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/dollar.jpg" alt="" title="One Dollar Bill" width="300" height="300" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2765" /></a>

<p>PLM may sound simple, the art is all about science and magic. Ensuring that you understand what is happening in the world, in terms of the environment (where the stuff to make everything comes from = science), knowing as much as you can about the people who could buy it and what they need and want (even if they don&#8217;t know it yet = science) and putting something together that talks to you and me in such a way that we want it (magic).</P>

<p>This article focus on the start of any PLM journey <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15873765">WHO, WHAT, WHY&#8230;How could Reebok sell trainers for $1?</a></p>

<p>So, what is this really about?</p>
<ul>
	<li>Generating employee loyalty?</li>
        <li>Creating and innovating projects in poor and developing areas of the world?</li>
	<li>A chance for people to feel good again?</li>
	<li>Corporations doing good, really? Just think about what Coke did years ago. They went to the far flung places in the world and sold their product at a price point that area could afford.  Where ever I went with my backpack in the world I could share a coke with a local it was awesome and created world domination because of brand loyalty, people have grown up with that brand – it’s a fundamental part of their lives and has kept Coke at number 1 – creating brand loyalty is what this is all about isn’t it?</li>
	<li>Even if it is it’s a slap on the back all round because economically this is what developing areas need.  Source the materials locally so the people involved in that get money to invest in looking for better materials, get the local workforce to make them, so they have money to buy them (and educate their families which will lead to lots of other ideas) – it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.</li>
</ul>

<blockquote class="alignright">Sustainable PLM is still finding its feet in industry and I think this is a great example of just what can and needs to be done by companies who want to future proof what they do and how they do it. They say it’s a social project which is interesting and I assume a nice PR angle.  Social is just one aspect of work that is being addressed adidas are creating projects that address the future needs of doing business, finding new markets and ultimately new consumers.</blockquote>

<p> Interestingly the article focuses on the price point and how they are having to go back to basics to figure out how to make this work and what the price point is, it may not be a $1&#8230;this is fantastic and a exercise every business should be doing right now.  Forget the term recession, our world has changed and we need to know how to work within the new rules.</P>

<p>How are you looking forward to see who your future customers are and how you are going to reach them no matter how unrealistic that may sound? May be everyone should start a $1 project&#8230;</P>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/05/sustainable-plm-the-1-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Good&#8217; Game?</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/01/good-game/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=good-game</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/01/good-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Whittaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Originality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheeky-monkey.co/?p=2730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online gaming has become a rapidly growing activity for more and more people in recent years. Partly due, I assume, to the ability of connecting with other players and the escapism of building a different online life or world. Hand in hand with gaming goes the incessant Facebooking that has left many businesses debating over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online gaming has become a rapidly growing activity for more and more people in recent years. Partly due, I assume, to the ability of connecting with other players and the escapism of building a different online life or world. Hand in hand with gaming goes the incessant Facebooking that has left many businesses debating over its effect, detrimental or otherwise, on worker productivity. Since purchasing apps or games has become a mass money-making phenomenon in itself, I was intrigued to read about <a href="http://www.wetopia.com/">WeTopia</a>, an online game that’s designed to provide gamers with the fantasy world they collectively desire while raising money for real children’s charities.</p> 
<a href="http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/01/good-game/wetopia/" rel="attachment wp-att-2731"><img src="http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/wetopia-300x116.jpg" alt="" title="wetopia" width="300" height="116" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2731" /></a>

<p>Firstly, it’s free to play. You can build villages and help neighbours for ‘joy’ currency, in-game coins for real charitable works which are converted to real-world non profit donations that promote healthcare and education. Buying an in-game fountain, for example, contributes a donation for cleaner water. Players can support projects they choose that help people around the world and then track them on a day to day basis. But perhaps most commercially distinctive, players can generate a donation from a sponsored advertiser through ‘joy’ points, without any money out of their own pocket.</p>

<p>I’m not a gamer myself, but could this ‘social gaming’ be a thing that really takes off? Two problems I can see create an interesting debate. Is the very attraction to gaming, in that it’s disconnected from the mundaneness of real-life, undermined by this link to the harsh reality of the real world? Further, is linking this harsh reality for some to frivolous play-time for others ever going to be good thing?</p>

<p>Personally, I fell in love with this idea. The question of success will be answered in how well it’s executed. Social enterprises often struggle with the straddling of economic success and moral purpose, needing to be doing ‘good’ in two often incompatible ways. The key in delivering success in all areas will be answered by asking how well they are fulfilling their players, investors and customers’ needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/12/01/good-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am 77,745,180,412th person to have lived</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/11/21/i-am-77745180412th-person-to-have-lived/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=i-am-77745180412th-person-to-have-lived</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/11/21/i-am-77745180412th-person-to-have-lived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nina Dar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Change Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformational Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population growth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheeky-monkey.co/?p=2599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was born I was the 3,641,850,266th person alive on this earth, check out where you are on the BBC Website. Obviously this is just a bit of fun but it does make you think which is what the UN were doing when they announced that the world population had hit 7 Billion Also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<P class = "forward">When I was born I was the 3,641,850,266th person alive on this earth, check out where you are on the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-15391515" title="BBC Website">BBC Website</a>. Obviously this is just a bit of fun but it does make you think which is what the UN were doing when they announced that the world population had hit 7 Billion</P>

<p>Also really interesting that the fastest shrinking country is Moldova, why? emigration. Whereas the the fastest growing country is Qatar, why? immigrant workforce. Bring in the statistics on urbanisation and a good bottle of wine and we could be hear for some time.</p>

<p>The numbers are not accurate but we know that the message is correct the world population is growing at speed and we need to be aware of the challenges that creates.</p>

<blockquote class = "alignright">Impact on the environment depends on population size, consumption and how technology effects the environmental impact. Of course we need to look at ways we can reduce consumption and improve technology &#8211; we need more innovation in these areas.</blockquote>

<p>Is a diverse group of people more innovative and creative than a homogeneous one? Is migration going to be the worlds self healing programme? I have no factual data on this but I do know what I see.  The worlds greatest cities are already inhabited by large and diverse foreign populations and there are lots of migrant entrepreneurs.  The transnational companies we work with have diverse working teams that create innovative behaviour just because of the differences in the group.</P>

<p>The world is getting bigger and its changing.</p>
<a href="http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/11/21/i-am-77745180412th-person-to-have-lived/10189-cm-illustrations-pres/" rel="attachment wp-att-2605"><img src="http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/10189-CM-illustrations-pres-e1321874257770-292x300.jpg" alt="" title="10189 CM illustrations pres" width="292" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2605" /></a>

<p>Mobility of highly skilled workers has been increasing due to globalisation and the growing importance of the knowledge economy, many companies already benefit from this and countries too benefit from the transfer of new ideas and work practices; there is an increasing amount of new knowledge and ideas that we should be harnessing and using to solve the problems we face.</P>

<p>The younger migrants seem to have a great skill base, are more entrepreneurial, less risk averse and believe that they will move several times in their life and commute between countries.  This is just what the world needs surely? Is the biggest challenge how we bring that together and make it work? The heart in the picture represents what we need to achieve, as we tell our clients most weeks; talking about and planning change is easy its the execution of sustainable change that is difficult and of course makes the difference.</p>

<p>As the 3,641,850,266th person alive on earth I want to make a difference, what about you?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/11/21/i-am-77745180412th-person-to-have-lived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amon Tobin: ISAM</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/06/02/amon-tobin-isam/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=amon-tobin-isam</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/06/02/amon-tobin-isam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think Different]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/?p=1471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I spotted a YouTube promo for electronic musician Amon Tobin’s tour to promote his new album ISAM. The album is an atmospheric blend of industrial and digital sounds created through his experiments to synthesise everyday noises like light bulbs clinking together or chairs creaking.  Although this might give the impression that it sounds like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yesterday, I spotted a YouTube promo for electronic musician Amon Tobin’s tour to promote his new album ISAM.

The album is an atmospheric blend of industrial and digital sounds created through his experiments to synthesise everyday noises like light bulbs clinking together or chairs creaking.  Although this might give the impression that it sounds like someone falling over in a shed, the results are more like the soundtrack to an alien invasion.

This sense of experimentation has continued through to his live performance through the development of an enormous ‘pixelated’ set that will then have digital images projected onto it to create a full sensory experience.  I think it looks absolutely amazing…

<em><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WLrt7-kIgIM" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WLrt7-kIgIM"></embed></object></em>

<em>“Experimenting is a way to keep yourself interested, and a way to hopefully find new territories and new places to go.”</em>

<em>Amon Tobin</em>

Through this experimentation he has created an exciting vision that has obviously inspired the production team to create a show that is innovative in its own way while completely reflecting the music he has created.

I love the excitement and sense of achievement that everybody displays in talking about the ways that they overcame technical and logistical issues in creating the show and the pride in the final product.

It just goes to show. Give people the opportunity to be creative and they can achieve amazing feats.  The question is, how do you structure that?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/06/02/amon-tobin-isam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1991: The Year That Punk Broke</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/02/23/1991-the-year-that-punk-broke/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=1991-the-year-that-punk-broke</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/02/23/1991-the-year-that-punk-broke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevermind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nirvana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product lifecycle management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/?p=1308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s here.  The moment I’ve been looking forward to and dreading in equal measure.  The Nineties revival is coming. The recent issue of MOJO is marking 20 years since the release of Nirvana’s Nevermind; an album that made a massive impact on me when I was a teenager.  Coincidentally, a podcast that I listen to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It’s here.  The moment I’ve been looking forward to and dreading in equal measure.  The Nineties revival is coming.

The recent issue of MOJO is marking 20 years since the release of Nirvana’s Nevermind; an album that made a massive impact on me when I was a teenager.  Coincidentally, a podcast that I listen to also had a special 90s edition.  The starting point for their discussion was the release of Nevermind.
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-1309 aligncenter" title="nevermind" src="http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/nevermind.bmp" alt="nevermind" /></p>

Nevermind has had a lasting impact on my music taste, even though I haven’t really listened to it properly in over 10 years.  What it really demonstrates is the way that innovation happens.

Kurt Cobain was heavily influenced by the music that he listened to; The Vaselines, The Butthole Surfers, Iggy &amp; the Stooges, Mudhoney, The Pixies.  These bands were never going to really make the mainstream because their ideas were pretty far out and didn’t really appeal to the masses.  Sure some of these have had some commercial success but never to the level that Nirvana went on to achieve.

Kurt Cobain made all these things easy for the mainstream to digest; he made them pop.

In these circles this is not a cool thing to say but it’s true.  What made Nirvana special was they were fans; they knew what was happening and created it from a love of what they heard.

The other key factor in the album’s success was timing.  Mainstream rock music had turned into a pastiche of itself through over-produced, over-indulgent ‘hair metal’ bands.  Nirvana swept through in a wave of raw noise and ripped jeans.  Nirvana were exciting!!

So what does this approach mean 20 years later?  If anything it should be easier to create a Nevermind.

The world of social networking makes the world of what new things are happening and what people want transparent.

The interesting question is, “Who or what is going to be your Kurt Cobain?”  Or, how are you going to make sense of all your ideas and focus them into to something that will change somebody’s life?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2011/02/23/1991-the-year-that-punk-broke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truth, lies and marketing&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2010/08/06/truth-lies-and-marketing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=truth-lies-and-marketing</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2010/08/06/truth-lies-and-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nina Dar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think Different]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/?p=1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The digital age means we no longer believe the advertising we see (well very few of us do, probably my mum and your nan) instead we believe what people tell us in chat rooms, forums, blogs and the like. If you are really cynical about these things (like me) you will believe the thought leaders knew this was coming and planted “real people” in the social networking arena so we could believe what they were saying (and it was free).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIFYPQjYhv8&amp;feature=player_embedded#! ">digital age </a>means we no longer believe the advertising we see (well very few of us do, probably my mum and your nan) instead we believe what people tell us in chat rooms, forums, blogs and the like. If you are really cynical about these things (like me) you will believe the thought leaders knew this was coming and planted “real people” in the social networking arena so we could believe what they were saying (and it was free).

<strong><em>Are we really that gullible that we just believe what people tell us when it comes to products and services, things we part with our hard earned for?</em></strong>

<strong>In the biggest twist of fate I have seen for ages Coca-Cola say NO WE ARE NOT!</strong>

<strong><em>WHY, would the one of the worlds biggest consumer brands say that when it spends more than the GDP of a small country on marketing?</em></strong>

Check out this article being circulated on <a href="http://twitter.com/wayofthemonkey">Twitter</a> today – <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-robbins/the-dark-side-of-vitaminw_b_669716.html">The Dark side of Vitamin Water</a>
<blockquote>In a staggering feat of twisted logic, lawyers for Coca-Cola are defending the lawsuit by asserting that &#8220;no consumer could reasonably be misled into thinking vitaminwater was a healthy beverage.&#8221;

I completely agree with John Robbins who says I still can&#8217;t get over the bizarre audacity of Coke&#8217;s legal case. Forced to defend themselves in court, they are acknowledging that vitaminwater isn&#8217;t a healthy product. But they are arguing that advertising it as such isn&#8217;t false advertising, because no could possibly believe such a ridiculous claim.</blockquote>
My mind (that likes to process map everything) will not let go of this thought. Coke spend money convincing us their product is healthy, when all the time they know it’s not and believe we know it’s not. Is this the next raft of marketing innovation? Or is it that Coke believe that they just could not say “hands up your right and we are guilty as charged”
<blockquote>&#8221; Noting that the soft drink giant wasn&#8217;t claiming the lawsuit was wrong on factual grounds, the judge wrote that, &#8220;Accordingly, I must accept the factual allegations in the complaint as true.&#8221;</blockquote>
It will be interesting to see if this kills the brand or Coke are right, the one thing that has not changed is that through whatever channel, we will decide.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2010/08/06/truth-lies-and-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change is Inevitable</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/10/09/change-is-inevitable/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=change-is-inevitable</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/10/09/change-is-inevitable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yasmin Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transformational Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we witnessed a huge vote of <strong>‘no confidence’ </strong>in the Royal Mail’s ability to manage change, 67% of postal workers turned out to deliver a 76% ‘yes’ vote to support further strike action.  A clear sign that Royal Mail management are failing, and a clearer sign that Royal Mail are failing.</p>

<p>I can’t help but think that the constant threat of strike action, especially as they approach the busy Christmas period can only be compared to a ritual of self-harm.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we witnessed a huge vote of <strong>‘no confidence’ </strong>in the Royal Mail’s ability to manage change, 67% of postal workers turned out to deliver a 76% ‘yes’ vote to support further strike action.  A clear sign that Royal Mail management are failing, and a clearer sign that Royal Mail are failing.</p>

<p>I can’t help but think that the constant threat of strike action, especially as they approach the busy Christmas period can only be compared to a ritual of self-harm.</p>

<h4>Change is Necessary</h4>

<p>The Communication Workers Union (CWU) has agreed that <strong>‘change is necessary’ </strong>– <em>So what’s the problem?</em></p>

<p>In short they would like…</p>
<img src="http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/royal-mail-bike.jpg" alt="royal-mail-bike" title="royal-mail-bike" width="200" height="175" class="alignright size-full wp-image-807" />

<ul>

	<li>Job security</li> 
	<li>No redundancies</li>
	<li>Higher pay</li>
	<li>Shorter working week</li>
	<li>More quality time</li>
	<li>More say in job roles</li>

</ul>


<p>I wonder, during this time of economic recovery, <strong><em>how many other businesses are maintaining the status quo?</em></strong></p>  

<p>Unfortunately the reality is <strong>there will be a price to pay for modernisation </strong>whether that is job cuts due to automation, higher prices to customers or privatisation.</p>  

<p>Royal Mail has a lot to live up to, they are a <strong>&#8216;British institution&#8217;</strong>, and both employee and customer will have a perception of what this means.  Has our relationship with Royal Mail forced them to hold back on radical modernisation? Or did it make them complacent?</p>

<h4>Is it too Late?</h4>

<p>The price of a stamp is a bargain, for 39p you can send a standard letter 1st class to anywhere in the UK, <strong>it’s incredible that they have been able to offer this service for so long</strong>.  Personally I would like it to continue and would be happy to take a price rise on the chin if I knew that my letter would arrive when I needed it to.  Solutions are rarely this simple, the postman is still delivering my mail but the envelopes are marked ‘UK Mail’, they offer the same service for just 32p.</p>

<p>It seems all are agreed on the fact that change is inevitable, for Royal Mail and their competitors this is <strong>‘consumer led’ </strong>and as a result ultimately needs to lead to increasing customer satisfaction.  For Royal Mail it’s a game of catch-up, will they do or die?</p>



<blockquote><strong>“He who rejects change is the architect of decay.  The only human institution which rejects progress is the cemetery.”</strong>  &#8211; Harold Wilson</blockquote>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/10/09/change-is-inevitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Do It!</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/24/just-do-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=just-do-it</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/24/just-do-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yasmin Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just do it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>“We are not paid to think, just do – copy, paste, print”</strong></blockquote>

<p>When you consider the reasons why a person would feel more inclined to just <em><strong>‘put their head down and get on with it’ </strong></em>you begin to wonder <strong>‘is thinking a trap’?</strong></p>

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While delivering an NPD workshop in Kenya this week Nina was disheartened by one of her pupils who said:</p>



<blockquote><strong>“We are not paid to think, just do – copy, paste, print”</strong></blockquote>


<p>I read this on Nina’s twitter, <a href="http://twitter.com/wayofthemonkey">wayofthemonkey</a> and it got me thinking about the mentality behind the statement, why people would feel this way and wondered, <strong>are they missing out?</strong></p>

<h4>Why?</h4>

<ul>

	<li>Most of us <strong>‘need’ </strong>to work; does this <strong>‘need’ </strong>limit our enthusiasm?</li>
	<li>When an activity is <strong>non-negotiable </strong>do we switch to auto pilot?</li>
	<li>If we imagine what is ahead does it look <strong>too hard</strong>?</li>
	<li>Does thinking everything through <strong>slow us down</strong>?</li>
	<li>Will thinking force new and uncomfortable experiences that could lead to <strong>change</strong>?</li>
	<li>Will our wider network <strong>support</strong> new ideas?</li>
</ul>



<p>When you consider the reasons why a person would feel more inclined to just <em><strong>‘put their head down and get on with it’ </strong></em>you begin to wonder <strong>‘is thinking a trap’?</strong></p>

<h4>&#8220;Just Do It&#8221;</h4>

<p>In 1988 one of the most famous advertising slogans was coined for Nike &#8211; <strong>“Just Do It”</strong>.  The campaign has been a remarkable success given that 80% of trainers sold in the USA are not used for the purpose for which they were designed.  The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp5dZZBKTXQ">ads</a> rarely focus on the product, but on people, they give an insight into the intense, inwardly focused competitor.  Nike has attracted those who want the image without incurring the pain.</p>

<p>The truth is <strong>success is rarely nurtured in isolation</strong>. The sporting icons that Nike focuses on are undoubtedly great, but are they made greater by reaching out and utilising the talent of a combination of resources?</p>


<h4>Reach out</h4>

<p>When we focus on ourselves <strong>we are in danger of becoming detached </strong>from what is happening around us.  I am not just talking about our immediate team of people, company or community, but also the wider social network that we now have the ability to reach out to in so many ways.</p> 

<p>Reaching out is an opportunity to increase knowledge.  Extending our network of resources helps us to unlock untapped potential and <strong>access what is inside people</strong>, be it stories of success or failure.</p>


<h4>Are You Missing Out?</h4>

<p><strong><em>One person can not be great at everything</em>.</strong>  Thinking and engaging opens up everything we do in the world, its like <strong>‘magic’</strong>.</p>

<p>If we can set aside our fears of the changes our thoughts may bring, we will discover that every day holds the potential for something new.</p>

<h5>Think about it – Don’t miss out</h5>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/24/just-do-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think Different</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/17/think-different/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=think-different</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/17/think-different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nina Dar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformational Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Originality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Ardill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think Different]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>How many times do you hear the statement <strong><em>‘there is nothing new or original anymore’</em></strong>?</p>

<h4>Is it true?</h4>

<p>Surely everyday little pieces of original creation go missed by the world at large.  In fact, <strong>have we all become desensitized</strong> because we are bombarded with so many things at such speed?  Do we take enough time to realise <strong>how things knit together</strong>?</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>“Every act of creation is first of all an act of destruction” &#8211; Picasso</strong></blockquote>



<p>Why was Picasso so successful, sought after and inventive? <strong><em>He was not afraid to challenge what had gone before.</em></strong></p>

<p>How many times do you hear the statement <strong><em>‘there is nothing new or original anymore’</em></strong>?</p>

<h4>Is it true?</h4>

<p>Surely everyday little pieces of original creation go missed by the world at large.  In fact, <strong>have we all become desensitized</strong> because we are bombarded with so many things at such speed?  Do we take enough time to realise <strong>how things knit together</strong>?</p>

<h4>21st Century Originality</h4>

<p>It is the knitting together that creates the <strong>21st century originality</strong>.  As an example, over lunch with <a href="http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/en/Design-Council/Files/Podcast-Transcripts/Leading-with-Design-Ralph-Ardill/">Ralph Ardill </a>from the Brand Experience Consultancy he was talking about the science project he had launched in Dublin, <a href="http://sciencegallery.com/this_is_science_gallery">The Science Gallery</a>.  Building an experiential science centre is not original, but the key to the success of that project is that disenchanted teenagers who don’t know what they are into (art, media, science, music, porn, etc.)? will walk through the door not to be a spectator, but to be the creators of the projects that go on inside that building.</p>

<p>It is their hope that one of those participants will ultimately become a <strong>Nobel Prize </strong>winner.</p>

<p>It is the creative and inspiring knitting together of old and new that will enable that to happen.</p>

<h4>Move Forward</h4>

<p><br/></p>

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jULUGHJCCj4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x5d1719&#038;color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jULUGHJCCj4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x5d1719&#038;color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<p><em><strong>We have to look back to move forward</strong></em>.  The art is to deconstruct something that has been successful and be bold enough to push that vision so that it creates a new legacy.</p>


<p>This art of deconstruction creates disruption.  This process un-nerves people, pushing them outside their comfort zone, but only by doing this can we hope to create something of substance and originality. </p>
<h5><strong>What are you going to knit today?</strong></h5>
<img src="http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/knitted-monkey.jpg" alt="knitted-monkey" title="knitted-monkey" width="133" height="133" class="alignright size-full wp-image-498" />

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/17/think-different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PZ Cussons Innovation Centre</title>
		<link>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/01/pz-cussons-innovation-centre/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pz-cussons-innovation-centre</link>
		<comments>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/01/pz-cussons-innovation-centre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yasmin Hurst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PZ Cussons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to PZ Cussons who today celebrate the unveiling of their £26m Innovation Centre.  To Cheeky Monkey the Innovation Centre was much more than a building project, it was the bringing together of 3 businesses onto one site...</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Congratulations to PZ Cussons</h3>


<img src="http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/731-150x150.jpg" alt="731" title="731" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-313" />
<p>Congratulations to PZ Cussons who today celebrate the unveiling of their £26m <a href="http://www.crainsmanchesterbusiness.co.uk/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090630/FREE01/306309995/0/FRONTPAGE/-/-/pz-cussons-26m-innovation-centre-opens-on-wednesday">Innovation Centre</a>.  To Cheeky Monkey the Innovation Centre was much more than a building project, it was the bringing together of 3 businesses onto one site.</p>

<p>The Cheeky Monkey team had the honor of directing the wider Innovation Centre project, overseeing CBRE and Bennetts Architects as the construction team who were one of four main streams that contributed to the overall delivery of the PZC Innovation Centre.</p>
<img src="http://www.wayofthemonkey.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/03-150x150.jpg" alt="03" title="03" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-314" />

<p>Nothing makes us happier than to see this vision being unveiled and we would like to congratulate all employees of PZ Cussons for having the courage to invest in such a venture, swimming against the tide of businesses no longer investing in the UK.</p>


<p><br/></p>
<p><br/></p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheeky-monkey.co/blog/2009/07/01/pz-cussons-innovation-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

